“Little Women” wins my vote for best film of the year. Major factors in my decision are the star-studded cast and the sensitive direction and interesting adaptation of a novel about four sisters coming of age in Civil-War-era America.
Louisa May Alcott’s book, “Little Women,” which was published in two volumes in 1868 and 1869, has been a favorite of mine since I first read it in childhood. I always identified with Amy, the youngest, spoiled, sister. 😉
I don’t usually watch film adaptations of “Little Women” because I love the book so much, and that makes my standards for a film adaptation almost impossibly high.
But I was willing to take the plunge and see this one, since Greta Gerwig has proved herself to me to be an outstanding director. Her 2017 film “Lady Bird,” which stars some of the same actors as “Little Women” does, really impressed me.
I’m so glad that I did take the plunge to go see this “Little Women,” which just opened on Christmas, in a theater.
Even though the casting choices don’t completely coincide with the way I imagine the characters from the book, this is a wonderful ensemble cast.
I completely believed in the relationships within the family and with Laurie, Timothee Chalamet’s character.
Jo March is the central character of both the book and the movie. She is an alter ego for Louisa May Alcott.
Although in the book Jo has very dark hair, thus resembling Emily Watson in the film more closely than the reddish-haired Saoirse Ronan, I think Gerwig’s casting choices are spot-on.
Laura Dern as the girls’ mother, Marmee, and Meryl Streep as their Aunt March are also great choices and give the film great star power.
There is a definite 21st century slant to this version of “Little Women.” Gerwig’s screenplay stresses the economic need for marriage that drove 19th century women. But this doesn’t detract from the story. Instead I think it is in line with one of Alcott’s goals in writing the novel.



I didn’t enjoy Little Women when I first read it. I identified very strongly with Jo and was furious with her when she turned down Laurie. I still think she made the wrong choice.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was an Amy, so I was happy for her when she got to marry Laurie, since she had loved him from the time when she was very young. But I can understand your perspective, as a Jo (fittingly, since you’re a writer).
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know that way back when I was angry that she turned down Laurie, but now I have to reread it to see what I missed and if I still agree. Now economics and independence makes sense to me, but if they loved each other, it would be different. Gotta check it out. I do recall though thinking that the one he did marry was sort of an also-ran, not the first choice, and that felt weird. Gotta check it out!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, Amy was his second choice. But since I identified with her, I was happy with that result.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I read the book (like about 50 years ago) and remember it being a fairly easy read. The flashbacks in the movie threw me off some but there was still a lot to like.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The flashbacks were a bit confusing. I tried to keep track of things by Jo’s hair, but then that didn’t work completely since she grew it long again. 😛
LikeLike
I’ve heard nothing but good about the movie. Since you loved it so much, too, I might try to see it in the theater instead of waiting for it to come out on Blue-Ray!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Barbara, if a friend of mine hadn’t given me a gift card to AMC movie theaters, I probably would have waited, too. I’m rather spoiled by being able to hit Pause, which I can’t do in a theater. That said, though, there’s some really lovely landscape and cinematography in the film that I think comes off better on the big screen.
LikeLike
I love my pause button, too, and am much happier watching movies in the comfort of my home. I heard the whole movie was filmed in New England, my home, so it might be worth the trip to the theater to see the cinematography you mention.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, it is a very beautiful view of New England, where my family spent our summers when I was growing up. Actually there wasn’t any time during “Little Women” when I even thought about hitting Pause. I think you would appreciate it at the theater.
LikeLike
Even though I haven’t seen the movie yet, I enjoyed reading your review. It was interesting. Check out my recent post on my blog where I gush about Timothée Chalamet: https://mstakeontheworld.wordpress.com/2020/01/25/my-love-for-timothee-chalamet/
LikeLiked by 2 people
I love Chalamet, too, ever since I first saw him in Call Me By Your Name, a gorgeous movie!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree. From the actors to the cinematography and the choice of music; it was lovely.
LikeLiked by 1 person